Disposed
Ram Murat v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCA482/9421/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9421 of…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9421 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9421 of 2006
Applicant :- Ram Murat Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiv Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
None present on behalf of the applicant even in revised list.
The matter might have become infructuous due to efflux of time that is why the applicant is not interested for perusing the matter, it is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case, the applicant still interested in the matter, he will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today. Order Date :- 10.4.2018 N.A.
Ram Murat
Abhai Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court