The applicant in an application under Section 482 appeared absent. The counsel cited illness, but the court held the petition infructuous due to efflux of time and dismissed it for want of prosecution.
Petition dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2528 of 2006
Applicant :- V.K. Mishra Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- T.B. Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Government Advocate
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
None present on behalf of applicant even in revised list.
Even on the last date of listing, an illness-slip has been sent by Mr. T.B.Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and the matter was posted peremptorily today.
It seems that applicant is no more interested in pursing the matter and matter has become infructuous by efflux of time.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case the cause of action still survives and petition has not become infructuous, the applicants will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today.
Order Date :- 9.4.2018 Ajeet
V.K. Mishra
State Of U.P.
Abhai Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
