Smt. Khush Naseeb Banu v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution due to the applicant's absence and the efflux of time.
Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution due to the applicant's absence and the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8891 of 2006
Applicant :- Smt. Khush Naseeb Banu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Singh,R.R. Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
None present on behalf of the applicant.
On the last occasion the matter was adjourned on the request of the learned counsel for the applicant.
Today, none is present on behalf of the applicant even in revised list.
It seems that the matter has become infructuous due to efflux of time and the applicant is no more interested in pursing the matter.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 23.4.2018 N.A.
Smt. Khush Naseeb Banu
Abhai Kumar
Srinivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court