The applicant failed to appear in person to press the petition. As a result, the petition was dismissed as both infructuous and for want of prosecution, vacating any interim order.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Liberty to move recall application within six weeks if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8188 of 2006
Applicant :- Harmendra Singh @ Rinku Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vikrant Pandey,Shailendra Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
The case is listed under the " Group of cases likely to be infructuous ".
The case is listed under the heading of "Group of Cases U/S 482 Cr.P.C. (likely to be infructuous)".
Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicant to press this petition.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case the cause of action still survives and petition has not become infructuous, the applicant will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today.
Order Date :- 23.4.2018
Ajeet
Harmendra Singh @ Rinku
Abhai Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
