Single judge court dismissed an s. 482 Cr.P.C. application as infructuous and for want of prosecution due to efflux of time and lack of active pursuit by the applicants.
Petition dismissed; interim order vacated with liberty to recall within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8076 of 2006
Applicant :- Smt. Saroj Devi & Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mithilesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
The case is listed under the heading of "Group of cases U/S 482 Cr.P.C. (likely to be infructuous)".
None appears to press this petition even in revised list.
It appears that matter might have become infructuous due to efflux of time and it seems that applicants are no more interested in pursuing the matter.
The petition is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case cause of action still survives and it has not become infructuous, applicants will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today.
Order Date :- 26.4.2018 Ranjeet Sahu
Smt. Saroj Devi
Abaib K
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
