A section 482 application was dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution due to the efflux of time, as no applicant was present to press the petition. An interim order was vacated.
Petition dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 14
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7879 of 2006
Applicant :- Pyarai & Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Applicant :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Abhai Kumar,J.
Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicant to press this petition.
It appears that matter might have become infructuous due to efflux of time and it seems that applicants are no more interested in pursing the matter.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case the cause of action still survives and petition has not become infructuous, the applicants will be at liberty to move a recall application within six weeks from today. Order Date :- 25.4.2018 Ajeet
Pyarai & Others
State Of U.P.
Abhai Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
