Dismissed

Prameshwar Dayal Mishra and Another v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC16 Nov 2018A482/41244/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing criminal proceedings was rejected as disputed questions of fact could not be considered. Directions given for bail consideration if applicants surrender within 30 days; otherwise coercive action permitted.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings not quashed; bail to be considered if applicants surrender and apply within 30 days.

Prameshwar Dayal Mishra and Another Vs State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 55 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 41244 of 2018 Applicant :- Prameshwar Dayal Mishra And Another Opposite Party :- State Of Up And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kedar Nath Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶4

This application under Section 482, Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of case No. 862 of 2018 (Rajendra Mishra Vs. Parmeshwar Dayal) as well as the revision order dated 03.11.2018, under Sections 323, 504, 379 IPC, police station Khukhundu, district Deoria in Criminal Rivision No.127 of 2018(Parmeshwar Dayal Mishra Vs. Rajendra Mishra and another), pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Court No.11, Deoria.

¶5

The contention of the counsel for the applicants is that no offence against the applicants is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.

¶6

From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submission made at the bar relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court in exercise of power conferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. Moreover, the applicants have got a right of discharge under Section 239 or 227/228 or 245 Cr.P.C. as the case may be through a proper application for the said purpose and he is free to take all the submissions in the said discharge application before the Trial Court.

¶7

The prayer for quashing the proceedings is refused.

¶8

However, it is provided that if the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, then the bail application of the applicants be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P . reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P . For a period of 30 days from today or till the disposal of the application for grant of bail whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶9

With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed of.

¶10

Order Date :- 16.11.2018/Ravi Kant

Prameshwar Dayal Mishra and Another v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prameshwar Dayal Mishra and Another v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aslam and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Amar Singh @ Amar Rati Ram Nishad Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Gautam Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Siddharth Jain Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ritesh Kumar Ghai and 2 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Shabana Parveen Vs State of U.P.