In this writ petition under Article 227 seeking to quash orders confirming the dismissal of a criminal complaint, the High Court found no grounds for interference. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, and the impugned orders were refused quashing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 55
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8522 of 2018
Petitioner :- Gautam Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saroj Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Present petition has been filed for setting aside the order dated 13.06.2018 passed by the Sessions Judge, Chandauli in Criminal Revision No. 43 of 2016 (Gautam Kumar Vs. Raja Ram and other) by which Revisional Court has confirm the complaint dismissal order dated 04.06.2016 (Gautam Kumar Vs. Raja Ram), passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chandauli in Complaint Case No. 3702 of 2015 (Gautam Kumar Vs. Raja Ram and others).
After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and after perusing the orders impugned as well as material on record, this Court is of the opinion that the learned counsel for the petitioner could not point out any good ground which may call for interference by this Court in exercise of power conferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing the orders impugned.
Accordingly, the prayer for quashing the orders impugned is hereby refused.
Present petition lacks merit and is dismissed.
No order as to costs.
Order Date :- 15.11.2018 Arti
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere under Article 227 to set aside the Sessions Judge's order confirming the dismissal of a criminal complaint.
Whether any good ground exists to call for interference in the exercise of revisional power.
Whether the prayer for quashing the impugned orders of the lower courts should be allowed or refused.
Gautam Kumar
State Of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
