The Hon'ble Court dismissed an application u/s 482 where parties had settled the matter amicably through the Mediation Centre, rendering the application infructuous. The court reserved liberty for restoration/recall if needed.
Application under Section 482 dismissed; liberty to file restoration/recall application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 48
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 39533 of 2017
Applicant :- Anil Kumar And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohammad Khalid Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
Case has been called out, but despite repeated calls none has appeared to press this application. Learned A.G.A. is present.
Perused the record.
It appears that in order to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement the matter was referred to the Mediation Centre. The report of the Mediation Centre reveals that the litigating parties have resolved to settle the matter amicably with mutual consent. It appears that because of the mutual settlement arrived at in between the parties the matter, in all probability, has been rendered infructuous. That seems to be the obvious reason why the matter is not being pursued any more in the right earnest. The Court is of the view that no useful purpose shall be served by keeping this application alive.
In aforesaid circumstances, the application stands dismissed.
It is observed that if at all the matter is surviving still, the applicants shall have the liberty to move restoration/recall application against the order of dismissal.
Order Date :- 5.9.2018
shiv
Anil Kumar And 2 Others
Karuna Nand Bajpayee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
