The Hon'ble Court dismissed the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as it was found that the applicant had not surrendered nor moved any bail application, rendering the petition misconceived and not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 42
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3324 of 2018
Applicant :- Bakhitiyar Khan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Ors Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Hasan Shaukat Abidi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J.
Heard Sri Syed Hasan Shaukat Abidi, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ashish Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State.
By means of this 482 Cr.P.C. application, the applicant has prayed for a direction to the court below to consider the bail application of the applicant in Case Crime No. 518 of 2017 under Section 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 504, 506, 427 I.P.C., police station Mugalpura, District Moradabad on the same day.
After having examined the prayer made in the present application and perused the material brought on record, I find that neither the applicant has surrendered before the court below nor moved any bail application, hence, the present application is wholly misconceived and not maintainable.
The application is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 7.2.2018 Deepika
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application of the applicant should be quashed due to lack of compliance with procedural requirements of surrender and filing bail application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bakhitiyar Khan
State of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
