Ashish Bansal v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution. The applicant failed to appear to press the petition, and the interim order was vacated.
Application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution. The applicant failed to appear to press the petition, and the interim order was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 45
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3105 of 2005
Applicant :- Ashish Bansal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- A. Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
It is an old matter.
List has been revised.No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application.
Learned A.G.A. is present.
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 10.12.2018 Atul kr. sri.
Ashish Bansal
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court