Rajiv Kumar Agarwal v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the applicant. Any interim order stands vacated.
Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the applicant. Any interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 1
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27756 of 2009
Applicant :- Rajiv Kumar Agarwal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anoop Trivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
The case called out in the revised list.
No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this 482 Cr.P.C. application. Sri N.K.Verma, learned A.G.A. for the respondent-State is present.
The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
The office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial court concerned for necessary information and follow up action, if so required.
Order Date :- 31.8.2018 Ashish Tripathi
(Ajay Bhanot,J.) (Ramesh Sinha,J.)
Rajiv Kumar Agarwal
State Of U.P.
Ramesh Sinha
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court