Amit Tayal and Anr. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Court No. - 49

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18732 of 2018

Applicant :- Amit Tayal And Anr Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Vikash Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A for the State.

¶6

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash non-bailable-warrant dated 7.7.2015 passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate in Case No. 395 of 2013 (State Vs. Amit Tayal and another), arising out of Case Crime No. 429 of 2012, under Sections 323, 324, 504, 506, 341, 420 IPC, Police Station, Hapur Dehat, District Hapur, pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur.

¶7

Having heard the learned counsel for the applicants and perused the materials brought on record, it do not appear to be a fit case to quash the impugned order. The prayer to quash the same is hereby refused, at this stage.

¶8

However, looking at the nature of offence alleged and attending facts and circumstances of the case, as have been brought on record, it is directed that if the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.

¶9

For a period of 30 days and no more, from today, the non-bailable warrant issued against the applicants shall be kept in abeyance.

¶10

In case, the applicants do not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, the trial Court shall adopt all coercive measures to secure their attendance.

¶11

The present application stands disposed of .

¶12

Order Date :- 25.5.2018 Mini

Amit Tayal and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Tayal and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Jakir Vs Union of India and Others

Dinesh Sharma Vs Excise Commissioner and Others

Sarita Devi Vs State of U.P. Thru Secy. Primary Education and Others

Sandeep Vs State of U.P. and Others

Awadhesh Kumar Pandey and Others Vs State of U.P. and Others

Chandra Prakash Vs State of U.P. and Others