Allowed

Ram Babu and 3 Ors. v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC26 Apr 2018A482/13594/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of criminal proceedings. The single judge allowed the application as withdrawn, directing the applicants to file a bail application before the lower court within four weeks in accordance with Amrawati and Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file bail application before the Court of Sessions within four weeks.

Ram Babu and 3 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Another — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 10

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13594 of 2018

¶3

Applicant :- Ram Babu And 3 Ors Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jawahar Lal Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding of Case Crime No. 404 of 2017, (State Versus Ram Babu and others) Under Sections 489, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3(1) (DH), 3(2)(V) SC/ST Act, P.S. Manjhanpur, District Kaushambi as well as charge sheet dated 17.08.2017 and cognizance order dated 30.11.2017.

¶6

After advancing argument at length, learned counsel for the applicants would submit that applicants would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to the court below to consider the bail application of the applicants in terms of the decisions rendered in Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P., 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P., 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) .

¶7

Learned A.G.A. would submit that the directions issued by this Court and the Hon'ble Supreme Court is binding upon the court below. A Division Bench of this Court in Brahm Singh & others vs. State of U.P. & others, 2016 (7) ADJ 151 , has already issued direction to all the Sessions Judges of the State of Uttar pradesh, which is being followed. It is, therefore, urged that no fresh direction is required to be given. This fact is not being disputed by the learned counsel for the applicants.

¶8

In regard thereto, application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to the applicants to file an appropriate application for bail before the court below within four weeks from date in terms of the decisions rendered in Amrawati (supra) as well as Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh (supra).

¶9

In the event, such an application is filed, it is expected that the court below shall decide/dispose of the application in terms of Amrawati (supra), Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh (supra) and Brahm Singh (supra), strictly in accordance with law.

¶10

It is clarified that the Court has not considered the contention of the learned counsel for the applicants on merit.

¶11

Order Date :- 26.4.2018 K.K. Maurya

Ram Babu and 3 Ors. v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Babu and 3 Ors. v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Dhar Vs D.D.C. and Others

Surendra Nath Vs B.R.

Sanjay and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Vaibhav Sharma Vs Central Bureau of Investigation

Deepak@Deep Narayan Vs State of Up and Another

Vinod Kumar Sharma Vs C.B.I