Ram Niwas v. Additional District Judge/ Special Judge (D.a.a.) and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This petition under Article 227 challenged an order where the revisional court held the applicant was a necessary party under Order 1, Rule 10 CPC because the suit property was a temple. The High Court upheld the revisional court's observation and dismissed the petition as devoid of merit.
What did the court decide?
The revisional order observing the applicant as a necessary party was upheld and no interference was granted.