required to be given to the petitioner in respect of application 12 Ga E, as therein, no new prayer was made, but only account number of the judgment debtor, which was to be attached was furnished. The Court also noted that on previous dates, notice of the execution case were duly served upon the petitioner, but it neither filed any objection against the execution case, nor deposited the decretal amount. The petitioner was given one more opportunity by order dated 9.4.2018, but again it did not avail the said opportunity. The petitioner thereafter filed another application dated 17.7.2018 for being granted 15 days' time to provide a calculation chart of the decretal amount and till then requested for execution case being stayed. Again, the application has been rejected by order dated 17.7.2018 observing that the notice of execution proceedings was served upon the petitioner long back, and there was sufficient time available to it to file the calculation chart. The Court further observed that the application filed by the petitioner is part of delaying tactics. The petitioner once again filed an application dated 20.7.2018 for recall of order dated 17.7.2018 and the said application has been rejected by order dated 20.8.2018. The Court, while rejecting the said application has noted the stand taken by the decree holder that the Special Leave Petition filed by the petitioner against the main award on basis of which amount was enhanced under Section 28-A stood approved by the Supreme Court, consequent to dismissal of Special Leave Petition. The Court also observed that repeated opportunities had been granted to the petitioner and the application No. 24 Ga E is only part of delaying tactics to procrastinate the matter.
