Single judge dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the underlying appeal had already been decided during its pendency. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
None. The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous following the disposal of the underlying appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18692 of 2012
Petitioner :- Smt. Mukhtar Begum Respondent :- Smt. Shakeela Begum Counsel for Petitioner :- Manish Tandon
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
Sri Manish Tandon, counsel for the petitioner states that since during pendency of the writ petition, the appeal itself has been decided, therefore, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
It is dismissed accordingly.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 10.12.2018
skv
Smt. Mukhtar Begum
Smt. Shakeela Begum
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
