Petitioner's writ petition under Article 227 dismissed for want of prosecution due to absence and lack of engagement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 802 of 2018
Petitioner :- Dev Nandan Respondent :- Civil Judge Junior Division Chunar And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
Since the filing of the instant matter, it was adjourned four times. The order sheet of last two dates reveals that no one was present, but still the matter was adjourned in the interest of justice. Today, again no one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition. It seems that the petitioner has lost his interest in the matter.
It is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J)
Order Date :- 29.3.2018 SL
Dev Nandan
Civil Judge Junior Division Chunar
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
