Petitioner challenged a revisional order. Court found no need to interfere with the order of remand but directed the court below to pass appropriate orders within three months. Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 45
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4352 of 2018
Petitioner :- Shivram Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Singh Parmar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Rishikesh Tripathi
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Rishikesh Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 & 5.
the petitioner has assailed the revisional order passed against the order in proceedings under Section 145, Cr.P.C. The order of remand does not calls for interference, however, the court below is directed to pass appropriate orders in pursuance of the revisional order of remand within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. before it.
The petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 6.12.2018 T. Sinha
Shivram Singh
State Of U.P.
Siddharth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
