The High Court dismissed a special appeal against an order rejecting an application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal, holding that the appeal was barred by limitation.
Disposal of appeal against rejection of condonation application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34 Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 19142 of 2011
IN
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 48 of 2012 Appellant :- Kumodini Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Yogish Kumar Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,K.S. Sahai
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Order Date :- 13.12.2017 IrfanUddin
Court No. - 34
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 48 of 2012
Appellant :- Kumodini Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Appellant :- Yogish Kumar Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,K.S. Sahai
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
The application seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal having been rejected vide order of date, this appeal being barred by limitation, is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 13.12.2017 IrfanUddin
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for condonation of delay should be allowed.
Whether the appeal is barred by limitation.
Kumodini Devi
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
