Section 3. Repeal and saving
(1) The Prevention of Terrorism (Repeal) Ordinance, 2004 (Ord. 1 of 2004) is hereby repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding such repeal, anything done or any action taken under the said Ordinance shall be deemed to have been done or taken under the corresponding provisions of this Act.
Judgements applying section 3
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50026 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2002 Thana- CHANDRAMANDI District- Jamui ====================================================== Khublal Marandi @ Chhotelal Marandi @ Kh
AllowedOpenIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:
AllowedOpenIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:
AllowedOpenIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:
AllowedOpenIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:
AllowedOpenAnanthi @ Amalorpavam Vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep by, the Deputy Superintendent of Police
Outcome: AllowedPOTA bail appeal; Madras High Court; Crl.A. No.192 of 2025; Ananthi @ Amalorpavam; accused No.20; Spl.SC No.3/2022; Crl.M.P.No.26/2025; Special Court under Prevention of Terrorism Act, Poonamallee, Chennai; Section 34 POTA 2002; Sections 3(5) of POTA, 2022; IPC 120 B, 148, 207 r/w 149, 333 r/w 149;
AllowedOpen
Show 4 more
Nitish @ Nitish Kumar @ Nitish Yadav @ Birbal Yadav and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar
Outcome: DismissedCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (DB) No.1092 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2002 Thana- NAUHATTA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1. Nitish @ Nitish Kumar @ Nitish Yadav @ Birb
DismissedOpenDuraisingavel @ Velu @ Durai @ Maran @ Rameshkumar @ Nathan @ Seeralan @ Gowtham Vs the State Rep by
Outcome: DismissedIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 01.02.2024
DismissedOpenIn the appeal regarding the Nithari killings, the High Court reversed the conviction and death sentence of the appellant. Finding the confession involuntary due to prolonged custody without medical examination and lack of independent corroboration for recoveries, the court held that the prosecution failed to prove…
AllowedOpenHIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A . No. 836 of 2023 .... 1. Jageshwar Yadav @ Janeshwar Yadav 2. Ramdhani Yadav .… Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party .... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petit
AllowedOpen