Section 4. Power to declare establish, define and discontinue public ferries
The State Government may from time to time--
(a) declare what ferries shall be deemed public ferries, and the respective districts in which, for the purposes of this Act, they shall be deemed to be situate;
(b) take possession of a private ferry and declare it to be a public ferry;
(c) establish new public ferries where, in its opinion, they are needed;
(d) define the limits of any public ferry;
(e) change the course of any public ferry; and
(f) discontinue any public ferry which it deems unnecessary.
Every such declaration, establishment, definition, change or discontinuance shall be made by notification in the Official Gazette:
1[Provided that when a river lies between two States, the powers conferred by this section shall, in respect of such river, be exercised jointly by the State Governments of those States by notifications in their respective Official Gazettes 2***:]
Provided also that, when any alteration in the course or in the limits of a public ferry is rendered necessary by changes in the river, such alteration may be made, by an order under his hand, by the Commissioner of the Division in which such ferry is situate, or by such other officer as the State Government may, from time to time, appoint by name or in virtue of his office in this behalf.
Judgements applying section 4
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 2833/2016 1. Smti. Raju Bala Das, W/o. Rajani Kr. Das, Vill. Daukuchi, P.O. Nagarbera, Dist. Kamrup [Rural], Assam. 2. Sri Madhab Das, S/o. Lt. D
DisposedOpenTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 2833/2016 1. Smti. Raju Bala Das, W/o. Rajani Kr. Das, Vill. Daukuchi, P.O. Nagarbera, Dist. Kamrup [Rural], Assam. 2. Sri Madhab Das, S/o. Lt. D
DisposedOpenBEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM JUDGMENT AND ORDER (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in both the cases. Also heard Mr. Y. Doloi, learned Additional Advocate General, As sam, representing t
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM JUDGMENT AND ORDER (Oral) 1. Heard Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in both the cases. Also heard Mr. Y. Doloi, learned Additional Advocate General, As sam, representing t
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA Heard Mr. MA Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioners in WP(C) 4185/2013 and Mr. R Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners in WP(C) 4035/2015 and WP(C) 3902 /2015. Also heard Mr. SP Choudhu
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA Heard Mr. MA Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioners in WP(C) 4185/2013 and Mr. R Ali, learned counsel for the petitioners in WP(C) 4035/2015 and WP(C) 3902 /2015. Also heard Mr. SP Choudhu
Show 4 more
BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE A K GOSWAMI JUDGMENT AND ORDER As the subject matter of WP(C) No. 3606/2014, WP(C) No. 3710/2014, WP(C) No. 379 6/2014 and WP(C) No. 4321/2014 is interconnected, these four writ petitions had been bunched together
BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE A K GOSWAMI JUDGMENT AND ORDER As the subject matter of WP(C) No. 3606/2014, WP(C) No. 3710/2014, WP(C) No. 379 6/2014 and WP(C) No. 4321/2014 is interconnected, these four writ petitions had been bunched together
BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE A K GOSWAMI JUDGMENT AND ORDER As the subject matter of WP(C) No. 3606/2014, WP(C) No. 3710/2014, WP(C) No. 379 6/2014 and WP(C) No. 4321/2014 is interconnected, these four writ petitions had been bunched together
BEFORE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE A K GOSWAMI JUDGMENT AND ORDER As the subject matter of WP(C) No. 3606/2014, WP(C) No. 3710/2014, WP(C) No. 379 6/2014 and WP(C) No. 4321/2014 is interconnected, these four writ petitions had been bunched together