Section 4. Nothing in Act to confer judicial or administrative powers; or to render the presence of Kazi necessary; or to prevent any one acting as Kazi
Nothing herein contained, and no appointment made hereunder, shall be deemed--
(a) to confer any judicial or administrative powers on any Ka’zi’ or Naib Ka’zi’ appointed hereunder; or
(b) to render the presence of a Ka’zi’ or Naib Ka’zi’ necessary at the celebration of any marriage or the performance of any rite or ceremony; or
(c) to prevent any person discharging any of the functions of a Ka’zi’.
Judgements applying section 4
Division Bench addressed questions referred by Single Judge regarding the Kazis Act, 1880. The Court held the Act does not confer judicial or administrative powers on Kazis and does not prevent Muslims from appointing other persons for ceremonies.
DismissedOpenof 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DisposedOpenPetitioner again challenged the State's refusal to appoint him Kazi after his earlier identical writ petition was dismissed and review rejected. The Division Bench found no ground to take a different view and dismissed the petition, leaving respondents free to consider his claim per the Supreme Court's observations.
Petitioner again challenged the State's refusal to appoint him Kazi after his earlier identical writ petition was dismissed and review rejected. The Division Bench found no ground to take a different view and dismissed the petition, leaving respondents free to consider his claim per the Supreme Court's observations.
Petitioner again challenged the State's refusal to appoint him Kazi after his earlier identical writ petition was dismissed and review rejected. The Division Bench found no ground to take a different view and dismissed the petition, leaving respondents free to consider his claim per the Supreme Court's observations.
This judgment addressed a writ appeal challenging the government appointment of a second Kazi in Kandukur. The court interpreted Section 2 of the Kazis Act, 1880, distinguishing the case from one involving an existing Kazi, and dismissed the appeal holding the appointment valid.
DismissedOpen
Show 4 more
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 03.01.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE
DisposedOpenCase :- WRIT - C No. - 24086 of 2019 Petitioner :- Maulana Mohd.Riyasat Ali Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahabir Yadav,Ram Awtar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., or leaves such local area Hon'ble Manoj
DismissedOpenSRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO Writ Petition No.4122 of 2019 ORDER: The petitioner seeks writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in appointing the 3rd respondent as Government Kazi vide G.O.Rt.No.130 dated 10.03.2019 fo
DisposedOpenGAHC010008882013 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Rev.P. 289/2013 1:JAHURA KHATUN W/O NAHAR ALI D/O ABDUL REZZAQUE R/O VILL- KAPAHARTARY MOUZA- PAKA, P.O, P.S. and DIST. BA
DisposedOpen