Section 2. Definitions
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,--
(a) "Chairman" means the Chairman of the Council of States;
(b) "Committee" means a Committee constituted under section 3;
(c) "Judge" means a Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court and includes the Chief Justice of India and the Chief Justice of a High Court;
(d) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this Act;
(e) "Speaker" means the Speaker of the House of the People.
Judgements applying section 2
Supreme Court dismissed a Delhi High Court Judge's Article 32 petition challenging constitution of the Judges Inquiry Committee solely by the Speaker under s.3(2) of the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 despite same-day removal notices in both Houses.
DismissedOpenNos. 194 & 198/ 2021 and 221, 228, 233, 234, 235, 237, 246, 250, 252, 253, 305, 404, 408, 418, 436, 446, 448, 450, 451 & 461/ 2022) . AFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR (Judgment reserved on : 20.03.2024) (Judgment delivered on : 10.0
AllowedOpenCHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Cr.M.P.No.1461 of 2023 Rajkumar Tamboli, Aged About 54 years, Son of B.P.Tamboli, (at present posted as Joint Collector, Pamgarh, District-Janjgir- Champa), resident of Village-Chhatauna, Tahsil-Sakri, District- Bilas
AllowedOpenHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.86 OF 2022 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.569 OF 2022 Babasaheb S/o Gokul Kangude ...APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ...RESPONDENT ... Mr.Rahul
AllowedOpenHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.86 OF 2022 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.569 OF 2022 Babasaheb S/o Gokul Kangude ...APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ...RESPONDENT ... Mr.Rahul
AllowedOpenHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.86 OF 2022 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.569 OF 2022 Babasaheb S/o Gokul Kangude ...APPLICANT VERSUS The State of Maharashtra ...RESPONDENT ... Mr.Rahul
AllowedOpen
Show 4 more
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA C.R. No. 202/2017 Reserved on: 13.11.2018 Date of decision: 19.11.2018 Manasi Sahay Thakur …Petitioner Versus Madan Lal Sharma ...Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Whethe
AllowedOpen4234 07J IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4234 OF 2007 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 6849 OF 2016 Varsha Thakur w/o Ganesh Ghuge, Age 35 years, Occ. Government Servant, R/o. Residential
AllowedOpenof 2009 1 Crl. Misc. No.M-5982 of 2009 Crl. Misc. No.M-5996 of 2009 Crl. Misc. No.M-6426 of 2009 Crl. Misc. No.M-6249 of 2009 Crl. Misc. No.M-15364 of 2009 .. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1. Criminal Misc. No. M-239
AllowedOpenSRI JUSTICE G.BHAVANI PRASAD CRIMINAL PETITION No.7723 of 2009 DATED:22.09.2009 Between: Rokkala Ranga Rao .. Petitioner/party-in-person And Rokkala Ratnakumari and others .. Respondents ORDER: Heard the petitioner in person and Sri A.Rames
DismissedOpen