Section 2. Definitions
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,--
1[(a) "composite offence" means an act or conduct of a person occurred, wholly or in part, in a foreign State or in india but its effects or Intended effects, taken as a whole, would constitute an extradition offence in India or in a foreign State, as the case may be;]
(b) "conviction" and "convicted" do not include or refer to a conviction which under foreign law is a conviction for contumacy, but the term "person accused" includes a person so convicted for contumacy;
2[(c) "extradition offence" means--
(i) in relation to a foreign State, being a treaty State, an offence provided for in the extradition treaty with that State;
(ii) in relation to a foreign State other than a treaty State an offence punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one year under the laws of India or of a foreign State and includes a composite offence;]
(d) "extradition treaty" means a treaty 3[,agreement or arrangement) made by India with a foreign State relating to the extradition of fugitive criminals, and includes any treaty 3[,agreement or arrangement] relating to the extradition of fugitive criminals made before the 15th day of August, 1947, which extends to, and is binding on, India;
(e) "foreign State" means any State outside India 4* * * and includes every constituent part, colony or dependency of such State;
5[(f) "fugitive criminal" means a person who is accused or convicted of an extradition offence within the jurisdiction of a foreign State and includes a person who, while in India, conspires, attempts to commit or incites or participates as an accomplice in the commission of an extradition offence in a foreign State;]
(g) "magistrate" means a magistrate of the first class or a presidency magistrate;
(h) "notified order" means an order notified in the Official Gazette;
(i) "prescribed" means prescribed by rules made under this Act; and
(j) "treaty State" means a foreign State with which an extradition treaty is in operation.
Judgements applying section 2
1188/2019 Page 1 of 39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 08 th October, 2025 Pronounced on: 16 th March, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 1188/2019, CRL.M.A. 8679/2019, CRL.M.A. 36563/2019, CRL.M.A. 36564/2019, CRL.M.A. 36565/2019, C
Writ Petition (Criminal)Openon : 17.03.2025 Pronounced on : 29.04.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.2632 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. MANOJ THANDASER
DismissedOpenPage 1 of 76 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :19.02.2020 Date of decision :20.02.2020 + CRL.M.C. 870/2020 & CRL.M.A.No. 3517/2020 SANJEEV KUMAR CHAWLA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate wit
Nos. 3964/2018 & 468/2019 Page 1 of 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30 th May 2019 % Delivered on:15 th July , 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 3964/2018 & Crl.M.A.Nos.50758-59/2018 AMAN VYAS ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. K.
Writ Petition (Criminal)OpenNos. 3964/2018 & 468/2019 Page 1 of 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30 th May 2019 % Delivered on:15 th July , 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 3964/2018 & Crl.M.A.Nos.50758-59/2018 AMAN VYAS ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. K.
Writ Petition (Criminal)OpenSRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI + Writ Petition No.19958 of 2018 % Date: 05-7-2018 # Dr. Eunice Lalnunmawii Chawngthu, D/o Mr. C.Dothanga, IPS, Aged 35 years, Temporarily residing without address
DismissedOpen
Show 4 more
MADHYA PRADEESH JABALPUR (Writ Petition No. 13035/2014) Abu
AllowedOpen1633/2017 Page 1 of 17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 31.10.2017 Delivered on: 06.11.2017 + W.P(CRL) 1633/2017 & CRL.M.A.9059/2017(stay) & 13654/2017 (directions) PUNEET ..... Petitioner versus U O I ..... Responde
Writ Petition (Criminal)Open- DismissedOpen
no.1966/1999 Page 1 of 10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) NO.1966/1999 Date of Decision : 04.07.2011 SMT. ANUBHA …… Plaintiff Through: Mr.Rajat Aneja, Adv. Versus SH.VIKAS AGRAWAL …… Defendant Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, A
Civil Suit (Original Side)Open