Section 14. Penalty for contravention of provisions of Act, rules, order or direction
(1) Any noncompliance or contravention of any provisions of this Act, rules made thereunder or any order or direction issued by the Commission, shall be an offence punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend up to five years or with fine which may extend up to one crore rupees or with both:
Provided that the provisions of this section shall not apply to any farmer for causing air pollution by stubble burning or mismanagement of agricultural residue.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), the offence under this Act shall be non-cognizable and triable by the Jurisdictional Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, who shall not take cognizance of the offence except upon a complaint made by the Commission or any officer authorised by the Commission in this behalf.
(3) Where any offence under this Act has been committed by a company, every person who, at the time when the offence was committed, was directly in-charge of, and was responsible to, the company for the conduct of the business of the company, as well as the company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly:
Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any such person liable to any punishment provided in this Act, if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence.
(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3), where an offence under this Act has been committed by a company and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to any neglect on the part of, any director, manager, secretary or other officer of the company, such director, manager, secretary or other officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.
Explanation.---For the purposes of sub-sections (3) and (4),---
(a) "company" means any body corporate, and includes a firm or other association of individuals; and
(b) "director", in relation to a firm, means a partner in the firm.
(5) Where an offence under this Act has been committed by any Department of the Government, the Head of the Department shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly:
Provided that nothing contained in this section shall render such Head of the Department liable to any punishment if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he exercised all due diligence to prevent the commission of such offence.
(6) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (5), where an offence under this Act has been committed by a Department of Government and it is proved that the offence has been committed with the consent or connivance of, or is attributable to any neglect on the part of, any officer, other than the Head of the Department, such officer shall also be deemed to be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly.
(7) For the purpose of this section and the procedure to be followed thereunder, the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), shall apply.
Judgements applying section 14
M/S Bikanervala Foods Pvt. Ltd. vs Commission for Air Quality Management in Ncr and Adjoining Areas through Member Secretary
Interlocutory ApplicationOutcome: DisposedThe National Green Tribunal allowed the appeal of an industrial unit against a closure order passed by the CAQM due to violations of consent terms. The Tribunal permitted the resumption of operations upon assurance of compliance and imposition of Environmental Compensation within four weeks.
Interlocutory ApplicationDisposedOpenBtw India Private Limited vs Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change
Interlocutory ApplicationOutcome: DisposedBTW India Private Limited appealed against the closure of its food manufacturing unit by the CAQM for using wood fuel. After an interim inspection confirmed compliance with biomass norms and no wood was found, the Tribunal permitted resumption of operations subject to further corrective measures and an undertaking.
Interlocutory ApplicationDisposedOpenBtw India Private Limited vs Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change
Tribunal AppealOutcome: DisposedThe Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by a food manufacturing company challenging the closure due to wood fuel usage. After verifying corrective measures and pending environmental charges, the Tribunal permitted resumption of operations.
Tribunal AppealDisposedOpen
Show 4 more
M/S Frick India Ltd. vs Commission for Air Quality Management in National Capital Region and Adjoining Areas (Caqm)
Tribunal AppealOutcome: DisposedM/S FRICK INDIA LTD. VS COMMISSION FOR AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION AND ADJOINING AREAS (CAQM) · ENVIRONMENT (PROTECTION) ACT, 1986 · DISPOSED · Appeal No. 37/2026
Tribunal AppealDisposedOpen