Section 15. Appeals to the Commissioner (Appeals)
(1) Any person,—
(a) objecting to the amount of tax on undisclosed foreign income and asset for which he is assessed by the Assessing Officer; or
(b) denying his liability to be assessed under this Act; or
(c) objecting to any penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer; or
(d) objecting to an order of rectification having the effect of enhancing the assessment or reducing the refund; or
(e) objecting to an order refusing to allow the claim made by the assessee for a rectification under section 12, may appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals).
(2) Every appeal shall be filed in such form and verified in such manner and be accompanied by a fee as may be prescribed.
(3) An appeal shall be presented within a period of thirty days from—
(a) the date of service of the notice of demand relating to the assessment or penalty, or
(b) the date on which the intimation of the order sought to be appealed against is served in any other case.
(4) The Commissioner (Appeals) may admit an appeal after the expiration of the period referred to in sub-section (3)—
(a) if he is satisfied that the appellant had sufficient cause for not presenting it within that period; and
(b) the delay in preferring the appeal does not exceed a period of one year.
(5) The Commissioner (Appeals) shall hear and determine the appeal and, subject to the provisions of this Act, pass such orders as he thinks fit and such orders may include an order enhancing the assessment or penalty:
Provided that an order enhancing the assessment or penalty shall not be made unless the assessee has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Judgements applying section 15
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8719/2026, CM APPL. 40923/2026 & CM APPL. 40924/2026 NIKHILL TANEJA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Percival Billimoria, Senior Advocate, Ms. Sonu Bhatnagar, Senior Advocates with Mr. Avinash Chandra,
Writ Petition (Civil)Open10998/2022 Page 1 of 54 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 25th July, 2023. Date of decision:26th September, 2023 + W.P.(C) 10998/2022 & CM APPL. 41138/2022 PRATEEK CHITKARA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal,
Writ Petition (Civil)OpenOF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR Reserved On: 6th of September, 2022. Announced On: 16th of September, 2022. i. WP (C) No. 594/2021 — Tabasum Mir v. Union of India & Ors. ii. WP (C) No. 596/2021 — Amir Mir v. Union of India & Ors.
DismissedOpenAbdul Rashid Mir Legal Representative of Sabeha Mir (Deceased) Vs Union of India through Secretar Finance, Ministry of Fincance and Ors.
Outcome: DismissedOF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR Reserved On: 6th of September, 2022. Announced On: 16th of September, 2022. i. WP (C) No. 594/2021 — Tabasum Mir v. Union of India & Ors. ii. WP (C) No. 596/2021 — Amir Mir v. Union of India & Ors.
DismissedOpenTabasum Mir Vs Union of India through Secretary Finance Ministry of Finance and Ors.
Outcome: DismissedOF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR Reserved On: 6th of September, 2022. Announced On: 16th of September, 2022. i. WP (C) No. 594/2021 — Tabasum Mir v. Union of India & Ors. ii. WP (C) No. 596/2021 — Amir Mir v. Union of India & Ors.
DismissedOpenSix writ petitions challenged notices, assessment orders and demand notices under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 concerning foreign trust assets.
DismissedOpen
Show 3 more
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR Reserved On: 6th of September, 2022. Announced On: 16th of September, 2022. i. WP (C) No. 594/2021 — Tabasum Mir v. Union of India & Ors. ii. WP (C) No. 596/2021 — Amir Mir v. Union of India & Ors.
DismissedOpenOF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR Reserved On: 6th of September, 2022. Announced On: 16th of September, 2022. i. WP (C) No. 594/2021 — Tabasum Mir v. Union of India & Ors. ii. WP (C) No. 596/2021 — Amir Mir v. Union of India & Ors.
DismissedOpen9501 of 2021 sl. 8 Kritin Bothra Vs DDIT(Inv.) Unit-3 (3), Kolkata Anr. Mr. Agnibesh Sengupta, Mr. Indranil Banerjee, Mr. Subrata Mukherjee … For the Petitioner. Mr. Dhiraj Trivedi, Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee … For the Respondents. Heard lear
DismissedOpen