Section 16. Power to make rules
(1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules for carrying out the purposes of this Act.
(2) In particular, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, the rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:—
(a) the qualification, experience, nature of duties and fee to be paid to the assessors and other ancillary or incidental matters under sub-section (1) of section 13;
(b) the practice and procedure of admiralty jurisdiction under this Act including fees, costs and expenses in such proceedings; and
(c) any other matter which is required to be, or may be, prescribed.
(3) Until rules are made under sub-section (2) by the Central Government, all rules for the time being in force governing the exercise of admiralty jurisdiction in the High Courts shall be applicable.
(4) Every rule made under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after the rule is made, or notification issued before each House of Parliament while it is in session for a total period of thirty days comprised in one session or in two or more successive sessions and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or notification or both Houses agree that the rule or notification should not be made or issued, the rule or notification shall thereafter have effect, only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule or notification.
Judgements applying section 16
Om Freight Forwarders Limited Vs Owners and Parties Interested in M v Nereus Progress Imo 9170913
Outcome: AllowedAdmiralty arrest and vacatur; bareboat/demise charter termination by notice versus repossession; gratuitous bailee; Section 5(1)(b) Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act 2017; maritime claim under Section 4(1)(h); MV NEREUS PROGRESS IMO 9170913; V.O.Chidambaranar Port Tuticorin;
AllowedOpenArte Bunkering Dmcc Vs Owners and Parties interested in the Vessel Mv Sea Moon (Imo 9647344)
Outcome: WithdrawnMadras High Court, Commercial Division (C.S(COMM DIV) No. 31 of 2026, N. Anand Venkatesh J., 06-02-2026): Admiralty suit by Arte Bunkering DMCC (Dubai) against the vessel MV Sea Moon (IMO 9647344, Union of Comoros flag) then lying at Chennai Port, claiming USD 343,402 (stated equivalent Rs.
WithdrawnOpenVietinbank Insurance Joint Stock Corporation Vs Owners and Parties Interested in Mv Spitha Imo No 9290153
Outcome: Withdrawn260 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
WithdrawnOpenCOURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12.08.2025 CORAM THE
DisposedOpenNeesa Ship Management Private Limited Vs Owners And Parties Interested In The Vessel Accomplice Imo No 9164079
Outcome: DismissedIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DismissedOpenGlobal Logistics Solution India Pvt. Ltd. and another Vs Mv Hope Seven Imo No 9686077
Outcome: DisposedDIV)No.50 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated
DisposedOpen
Show 3 more
DIV.) No.47 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DismissedOpenM/S.Cargo Care International Vs the Owners and Parties Interested in the Vessel M.v.Norashia Tegesos and 3 Others
Outcome: AllowedThis order addressed a petition seeking enforcement of a Letter of Indemnity (LOI) to recover damages for lost cargo. The High Court directed the insurer, West of England Ship Owners Mutual Insurance Association, to pay the guaranteed sum of US $1,77,078 in favour of the cargo owner, rejecting the insurer's plea of…
AllowedOpenand A.No.1562 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
WithdrawnOpen