Disposed

Madarsa Jamiya Islamiya Arabiya Faizul Uloom v. State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand HC9 Apr 2026WPMS/883/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition under Article 226 seeking unsealing of a Madarsa's premises on an undertaking to obtain due recognition before operating. The Court found the matter covered by its Co-ordinate Bench order dated 26.08.2025 in WPMS No.835 of 2025 (Madarsa Inamul Ulum Society), undisputed by the State, and disposed of the writ petition in light thereof, along with pending applications.

What the court decided

AI extract

Madarsa Jamiya Islamiya Arabiya Faizul Uloom Vs… — Education and Admissions | Uttarakhand HC (2026)

¶1

2026:UHC:2557

¶2

SL. No Date	Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures	COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
		WPMS No.883 of 2026 Madarsa Jamiya Islamiya Arabiya Faizul Uloom --Petitioner *Versus* State of Uttarakhand and Others --Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Faizan Ali, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for petitioner.
		2.Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel with Ms. Swati Verma, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondents. 3.This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby, petitioner has sought a writ of mandamus to permanently unseal the premises of the petitioner-Madarsa Jamiya Islamiya Arabiya Faizul Uloom situated at village Libbarhedi, Paragna Narsan, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar, on his giving an undertaking to the respondent-Authority that in future petitioner will not operate Madarsa in-question without due recognition by State under the rules and regulations. 4.At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his case is covered by the judgment and order of the Co- ordinate Bench dated 26.08.2025 in WPMS No.835 of 2025_Madarsa Inamul Ulum_ Society Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others, and batch of writ petitions.

¶3

2026:UHC:2557

¶4

5.	Learned State Counsel does not
dis	pute the contention made by learned
cou cov	nsel for petitioner that the matter is ered by the aforesaid judgment.
6. sta jud 7. dis	Accordingly, the present writ petition nds disposed of in light of the aforesaid gment and order. Pending application also stands posed of.
PN	(Pankaj Purohit, J.) 09.04.2026

Madarsa Jamiya Islamiya Arabiya Faizul Uloom v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Madarsa Jamiya Islamiya Arabiya Faizul Uloom v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kukretri Vs State of Uttarakhand

Pushpa Tyagi Vs State of Uttarakhand

Prem Ballabh Bhatt Vs Indian Red Cross Society through Its General Secretary

Sushila Rawat Vs State of Uttarakhand

Jaswinder Kaur Vs Govind Ballabh Pant Universtiy of Agriculture and Technology

Sukhjeet Kaur Vs State of Uttarakhand