Writ petition sought quashing of an FIR under Sections 8/21 of the NDPS Act. The State stated that no role had been assigned to the petitioner and the alleged supplier could not be traced. The Court disposed of the writ petition without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
UKHC010105882026
2026:UHC:5317
| SL. No. |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPCRL/1139/2026 Barkha --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Pawan Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Nikhil Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. The present Criminal Writ Petition has been filed seeking quashing of the First Information Report dated 29.05.2026, registered as Case Crime/F.I.R. No. 220 of 2026, under Sections 8/21 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985, at Police Station Raipur, District Dehradun. 3. Learned counsel for the State, on written instructions, submitted that during the course of investigation, the name of one Babita surfaced as the alleged supplier. However, despite efforts, no such person could be identified or traced. It is further submitted that no role has been assigned to the present petitioner in the commission of the alleged offence. 4. The written instructions submitted by the learned State Counsel are taken on record. 5. In view of the aforesaid statement made on behalf of the State and the written instructions placed on record, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. 6. Accordingly, the present Criminal Writ Petition stands disposed of. |
|||
| (Alok Mahra, J.) 03-07-2026 SB SHIKSHA BINJOLA Digitally signed by SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa08b09c12f2 1822fbd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0A9BED00E 67B5283D205F18FE29BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.07.03 16:44:05 +05'30' |
UKHC010105882026
2026:UHC:5317
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR under Sections 8/21 NDPS Act should be quashed where no role was assigned to the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Barkha
State Of Uttarakhand
Alok Mahra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
