Vipin Nayyar v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Uttarakhand High Court, C528/971/2026, decided 02.07.2026 by Rakesh Thapliyal, J. — Vipin Nayyar (applicant in person) v. State of Uttarakhand (Sandeep Sharma, learned AGA). Application under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 challenging an adverse remark in the order dated 12.12.2025 rejecting First Bail Application No.137 of 2025 (Additional Sessions Judge, Tehri Garhwal); Court held the remark will not prejudice the defence and directed the trial court (Special Sessions Trial No.15 of 2025, FIR No.41 of 2025, P.S. Muni-Ki-Reti, Tehri Garhwal) to proceed uninfluenced by it; C528 application disposed of finally. No cases cited; no costs or quantum.
What did the court decide?
Direction that the adverse remark of 12.12.2025 will not prejudice the applicant's right to take any defence plea in the trial court, and that the trial court will proceed with the trial without being influenced by that remark; subject to this direction, the C528 application was disposed of finally.