Dismissed¶7

Chand Khan v. Mohd Anees

Uttarakhand HC4 May 2026C528/887/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of criminal misc. application for quashing chargesheet and summoning order dated 03.05.2024 in Criminal Case No. 1580 of 2024 (Sections 323, 341, 504, 506 IPC) before Civil Judge (Jr. Div.)/Judicial Magistrate, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar; summoning order upheld as reflecting application of judicial mind; no infirmity or illegality found; no interference warranted; counsel Prince Chauhan for applicant; judge Alok Mahra, J.; decided 04.05.2026.

What did the court decide?

The evidence collected was placed before the learned court below, which, after applying its judicial mind, rightly summoned the applicant to face the trial. ¶5

Chand Khan Vs Mohd Anees — Uttarakhand HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

No	Date	Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures	COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
			C-528 No. 887 of 2026 Hon’ble Alok Mah r a, J. Mr. Prince Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. The present criminal misc. application is filed with a prayer to quash and set-aside the chargesheet, summoning order dated 03.05.2024 as well as the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1580 of 2024, under Sections 323, 341, 504 and 506 of IPC pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.)/ Judicial Magistrate, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the case and there is no evidence as such against the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant would further submit that the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned, without application of mind, has passed the summoning order dated 03.05.2024. 4. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and perused the record. 5. Perusal of the impugned summoning order dated 03.05.2024 reveals that the evidence collected was placed before the learned court below, which, after applying its judicial mind, has rightly summoned the applicant to face the trial. 6. The court concerned has considered & discussed all relevant aspects. Thus, the view taken by the learned Judicial Magistrate concerned cannot be faulted. This Court does not find any infirmity or illegality in the impugned summoning order dated 03.05.2024 passed by the court of learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.)/ Judicial Magistrate, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar in Criminal Case No. 1580 of 2024, under

¶2

Sect this with	ions 323, 341, 504 and Court does not find any the impugned order.	506 of IPC. Hence, reason to interfere
7. fails	Accordingly, the crimin and is hereby dismissed.	al misc. application
Ujjwal		( Alok Mah r a J.) 04.05.2026

Chand Khan v. Mohd Anees

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chand Khan v. Mohd Anees

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deen Mohammad Alias Dinna Vs State of Uttarakhand

Ankit Rathore Vs State of Uttarakhand

Amit Arya Vs State of Uttarakhand

Nidhi Vs State of Uttarakhand

Naresh Kumar Vs State of Uttarakhand

Bhuwan Chandra Pokhariya Alias Buban Vs State of Uttarakhand