The bench held that with the death of the sole accused-applicant, the criminal miscellaneous application became infructuous as proceedings could not continue and dismissed the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| No | Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| C482 No. 1907 of 2023 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. C.S. Rawat, learned counsel appeared on behalf of respondent no. 2. He has submitted before the Bar that the sole applicant has died. 2. In view of the submission above that the sole accused-applicant has died, the present criminal misc. application has rendered infructuous on the ground that the criminal proceedings cannot continue against the deceased person. 3. Accordingly, the present criminal misc. application stands dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. |
|||
| (Alok Mahra J.) 03.06.2026 Ujjwal |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present criminal miscellaneous application stands dismissed given the death of the sole accused-applicant.
Sole Accused-Applicant
Respondent no. 2
Alok Mahra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
