Allowed¶6

Devendra Alias Ladi v. State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand HC3 Jul 2026BA1/1080/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Uttarakhand High Court, single Judge (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.), BA1/1080/2026, decided 03.07.2026 — regular bail to Devendra @ Ladi for offence under S.109 BNS 2023 (FIR No.0012/2026, P.S. Dineshpur, Udham Singh Nagar); main assailant per prosecution is co-accused Jatin (parity with interim protection to Gurjigar Singh in WPCRL No.456 of 2026); bail allowed with stringent conditions owing to criminal history of four cases since 2015; useful on conditional bail where accused has antecedents and on parity-based bail pleas.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted to applicant Devendra @ Ladi on executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount, subject to stringent conditions: fortnightly reporting (twice a month, 15-day gap) to the nearest police station with SHO recording presence, providing his mobile number to the SHO, and immediate application by the prosecution for cancellation of bail if he is found indulging in any future criminal activity including offences under The Forest Act.

SL.
No.

Date

Office Notes,
reports, orders
or proceedings
or directions
and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

BA1/1080/2026
Devendra Alias Ladi
--Applicant
Versus
State Of Uttarakhand
--Respondent
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

Ms. Rajni Rangwal, learned counsel for
the applicant.
2.
Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned AGA for the
State.
3.
The instant bail application has been
moved by the present applicant Devendra @
Ladi, S/o Subhash for seeking regular bail in
reference to first information report dated
20.01.2026 bearing FIR No.0012 of 2026 P.S.
Dineshpur, District Udham Singh Nagar
wherein three persons namely, Jatin, Rampal
and the present applicant with some other
unknown persons were implicated for the
offence punishable under Section 109 of BNS,
2023.
4.
It is argued by learned counsel for the
applicant that the present applicant is innocent
and has been falsely implicated and even as
per the FIR itself the main assailant is one Jatin,
who caused injury to the injured. She further
argued that one of the co-accused Gurjigar
Singh was granted interim protection in
WPCRL No.456 of 2026 on the ground that
main assailant is the co-accused Jatin, who
caused injury to Harshvardhan.
5.
On the other side, learned AGA has not
disputed that as per the prosecution the main
assailant is Jatin however, he further submits
that the applicant is indulged in criminal
activities since 2015, which is evident from the
fact that he has criminal antecedents of four
cases though in response to this, learned
counsel for the applicant submits that in two

Devendra Alias Ladi v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devendra Alias Ladi v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Apoorva Nautiyal Vs State of Uttarakhand

Nawab Ali Vs State of Uttarakhand

Dhirendra Singh Gailakoti Vs State of Uttarakhand

Shashi Verma Vs Vinay Tyagi

Amandeep Kamboj Vs State of Uttarakhand

Suraj Kumar Vs State of Uttarakhand