straightaway approached this Court. In support of the said submission, reliance was placed upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mohammed Rafal & Another v. State of Kerala & Another, 2024 LiveLaw (SC) 884, wherein it has been held that, except in exceptional circumstances, a person seeking anticipatory bail should first approach the Court of Sessions and the jurisdiction of the High Court should ordinarily be invoked only after seeking relief from the Court of Sessions. 5. To this, learned counsel for the applicant sought permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with liberty to avail the appropriate statutory remedy before the competent Court of Sessions. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the applicant to approach the competent Court of Sessions by filing an appropriate application for anticipatory bail, if so advised. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, and any application so filed shall be considered independently in accordance with law. Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF MAM UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, (Alok Mahra, J.) 2.5.4.20=6a812005bebfcf46f24 07-07-2026 4f3e584af1449e430ef900bf09 a6d67ebbd642671329b, mamta TA postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=5de1751a4f1d9 cabfd54852c9e68911ca8b66d d26690a191648ab5d8dd004ef 0, cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2026.07.08 16:18:31 RANI +05'30'