Disposed¶4

Deena Nath and Others v. State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand HC1 Jul 2025WPSS/566/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Uttarakhand High Court; WPSS/566/2025; MCC No. 2 of 2025; restoration application allowed; recall of order dated 01.07.2025; petition restored to original number; Sitarganj Cooperative Sugar Factory Ltd.; Udham Singh Nagar; factory closure 15.12.2017; voluntary retirement; arrears of salary; retiral dues; revised pay scale; representation to Secretary, Cane Development & Sugar Industry; decision within four months; disposed of 28.11.2025; Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of WPSS/566/2025 (MCC No. 2 of 2025 allowed; order dated 01.07.2025 recalled); petition disposed of with liberty to petitioners to make representation(s) to Secretary, Cane Development & Sugar Industry, Uttarakhand within two weeks, for examination and decision as per law within four months. ¶4

Deena Nath and Others Vs State of Uttarakhand — Uttarakhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶4

Issue for consideration

Whether the restoration application (MCC No. 2 of 2025) should be allowed and the order dated 01.07.2025 recalled. +2 more

¶2

Court's answer

In the interest of justice, the restoration application (MCC No. 2 of 2025) is allowed and the order dated 01.07.2025 is hereby recalled.

¶2

Ratio / Principle

The petition is restored to its original number.

¶2

Key takeaways

The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioners to make representation(s) to Secretary, Cane Development & Sugar Industry, Uttarakhand, within two weeks from today.ratio¶4
If representation(s) are made within the stipulated time, the Secretary shall examine the matter and take a decision, as per law, within four months thereafter.ratio¶4

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Uttarakhand (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.), order dated 28.11.2025 in WPSS/566/2025: Restoration application (MCC No. 2 of 2025) allowed and the order dated 01.07.2025 recalled; petition restored to its original number. Petitioners, regular employees of Sitarganj Cooperative Sugar Factory Ltd., Sitarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar (factory closed w.e.f. 15.12.2017; voluntary retirement granted from different dates), had raised non-payment of arrears of salary and claimed retiral dues, including arrears as per the revised pay scale. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to make representation(s) to the Secretary, Cane Development & Sugar Industry, Uttarakhand within two weeks; the Secretary to examine the matter and take a decision, as per law, within four months thereafter. No statute, section, or named precedent is cited; Annexure 9 was an order of a Coordinate Bench in a similar petition. No monetary amount is specified.

¶1

2025:UHC:10643

¶2

SL. No.	Date	Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures	COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
			WPSS/566/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J 1. Case called out.
			2. None present for the petitioners/applicants.
			3. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand.
			4. In the interest of justice, restoration application (MCC No. 2 of 2025) is allowed. The order dated 01.07.2025 is hereby recalled.
			5. Let the petition be restored to its original number.
			6. Petitioners were regular employee of Sitarganj Cooperative Sugar Factory Ltd., Sitarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar. The said sugar factory was closed w.e.f. 15.12.2017 and petitioners were thereafter given voluntary retirement from different dates.
			7. In this writ petition, petitioners have raised the grievance regarding non- payment of arrears of salary and they have also claimed retiral dues, including arrears as per the revised pay scale. 8. Annexure 9 to the writ petition is an order passed by Coordinate Bench in a similar petition.
			9. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and also the

¶3

2025:UHC:10643

¶4

relief claimed by petitioners, the writ
petition is disposed of with liberty to
petitioners to make representation(s) to
Secretary, Cane Development & Sugar
Industry, Uttarakhand, within two weeks
from today. If such representation(s) is
made by petitioners within stipulated
time, the Secretary shall examine the
matter and take decision, as per law,
within four months thereafter.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
28.11.2025
Aswal
NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.11.28 03:51:59 -08'00'

Deena Nath and Others v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deena Nath and Others v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunder Singh Bora Vs Secretary,Public Works Department

Surbhi Gupta Vs Virendra Dhiman

Mayank and Ors. Vs State of Uttarakhand

Ramesh Chandra Jaiswal Vs Pankaj Jaiswal

Hira Lal Panjwani Vs Govind Bhawan Trust

Daudayal Vs Govind Bhawan Trust