Allowed¶2

Surendra Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand HC2 Dec 2025WPSS/2087/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Short modification-order record: MCC/1/2025 in WPSS No. 2087 of 2025 allowed by Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. on 11.02.2026; disposal order dated 02.12.2025 modified so that Chief Education Officer, Haridwar (instead of Director, Secondary Education) decides the petitioner's representation, as per law, within six weeks of presentation of certified copy; State represented by Additional Chief Standing Counsel raised no serious objection.

What did the court decide?

Modification Application allowed; order dated 02.12.2025 modified — Chief Education Officer, Haridwar directed to take decision on the petitioner's representation, as per law, within six weeks from date of presentation of certified copy of this order. ¶2

Surendra Kumar Vs State of Uttarakhand — Uttarakhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

SL. No Date	Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures	COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
11.02.2026		Modification Application (MCC/1/2025) In WPSS No. 2087 of 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Akshay Pradhan, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ganga Singh Negi, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
		2. This writ petition was disposed of vide order dated 02.12.2025. 3. Today, the matter is listed on Modification Application. In para 3(b) of the application, it is stated that Director, Secondary Education had referred the representation of petitioner for decision to Chief Education Officer; however, this aspect could not be highlighted at the time of hearing of the writ petition. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the judgment dated 02.12.2025 be modified and in place of ‘Director, Secondary Education’, ‘Chief Education Officer, Haridwar’ be directed to take decision on the representation. State Counsel did not seriously oppose the prayer for modification.
		5. Accordingly, Modification Application is

¶2

allowed. 6. Since stand tak	en by the petitioner is that
Director, Secondary	Education has forwarded
the representation	made by petitioner for
decision to Chief Ed	ucation Officer, Haridwar,
and if that stateme	nt is correct, then Chief
Education Officer, H decision on the re	aridwar is directed to take presentation, as per law,
within six weeks fro certified copy of this	m date of presentation of order.
7. Order dated	02.12.2025 is modified
accordingly. Mahinder/	(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 11.02.2026

Surendra Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Kumar v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pooja Singh Vs State of Uttarakhand

Girish Joshi Vs State of Uttarakhand

Renu Singh Vs State of Uttarakhand

Tajwar Singh Rana Vs Deputy Registrar Firms Societies and Chits

Uma Mathpal Vs State of Uttarakhand

Reshma Vs State of Uttarakhand