A writ petition (SB) was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner's counsel could not contact the petitioner despite multiple efforts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| D/17 | WPSB No.546 of 2017 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Harsh Rautela, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, Advocate for the respondent. Mr. Harsh Rautela, Advocate appearing for the petitioner would submit that he is present, but not appearing for the petitioner because he could not contact the petitioner despite multiple efforts made by him. The petition is dismissed in non- prosecution. |
||
| (Alok Mahra, J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 03.09.2025 Sanjay SANJAY KANOJIA Digitally signed by SANJAY KANOJIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=e50e50b49596520698eff87e0a08bbd504686d f4d1afc60f54a287831dec46fe, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26EEB7122ED0DD23233A255DD8EC450 A84B515A087CAEFD1B3179A7DEAE40699, cn=SANJAY KANOJIA Date: 2025.09.04 17:22:57 +05'30' |
Ravindra Maithani
Alok Mahra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
