Disposed
Vijay Prakash Sharma v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCWPSB/352/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Adjournment order only; no decision on merits.
What the court decided
AI extract
Adjournment order only; no decision on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No Date |
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|
| 0 4 .0 5 .2 0 2 6 | WPSB No. 352 of 2022 Vijay Prakash Sharma --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Gu pt a, C.J. Hon’ble Su bh ash Upadh yay , J. 1. Mr. B.S. Koranga, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Shivanand Bhatt, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.M.S. Mehta, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. B.S. Parihar, learned CGSC for the Union of India. |
|
| 4. Mr. Gaurav Nagpal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent no. 3/ UKMSSB. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners prays for adjournment. 6. List after four weeks. |
||
| ( Su b h ash Upadh y ay , J.) ( Man oj Ku m ar Gu pt a, C.J.) 0 4 .0 5 .2 0 2 6 0 4 .0 5 .2 0 2 6 Rahul |
Vijay Prakash Sharma
State of Uttarakhand
Manoj Kumar Gupta
Subhash Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court