Writ petition filed to quash an order expediting the statutory appeal. Court noted the appeal was initially defective but has since been cured. The Court held no need to quash the order given the expedited appeal proceedings.
The writ petition stands disposed of without any direction to quash or expedite.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|
| WPMS No.632 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Maulekhi, Brief Holder for the State. The petitioner seeks direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order DEC- 7A dated 08.01.2025, passed by the respondent and in alternate direction has been sought that the appellant authority may be directed to expedite and decide the statutory appeal. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the impugned order dated 08.01.2025, an appeal has already been preferred, which has yet not been disposed of. Learned State counsel would submit that till 27.02.2025, the appeal was defective. But, it has now been cured by the petitioner and the appeal is listed for hearing on 11.03.2025. The petitioner may very well participate in the appeal. There is no need to say that every appeal and petition should be decided as expeditiously as possible. This Court has no doubt that the appeal preferred by the petitioner will find expeditious disposal. With the above observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 06.03.2025 Sanjay |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of an impugned order needs to be decided when a statutory appeal is pending and has been cured.
Petitioner
State
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
