Dismissed
Patram v. Gram Sabha Sethpur, Pargana-Manglour
Uttarakhand HCWPMS/57/2015
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petitions dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioners.
What the court decided
AI extract
Writ petitions dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPMS No.55 of 2015 With WPMS No.57 of 2015 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. List revised. **2.**None present for the petitioner(s). **3.**Ms. Anjali Bhargava, learned counsel for the respondent-Gram Sabha. **4.**These writ petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. |
|||
(Pankaj Purohit, J.) 06.10.2025 PN |
Pankaj Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court