Disposed¶4

Anil Kumar Joshi v. Union of India

Uttarakhand HC9 Dec 2025WPMS/3406/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Uttarakhand High Court; WPMS/3406/2025; Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.; decided 09.12.2025; NIOS Bridge Course mark-sheet correction; practical examination marks omitted from mark-sheet; representation dated 28.11.2025 pending before Competent Authority; direction to decide representation as per law within eight weeks; writ petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no. 2 (NIOS) to take a decision on the petitioner's representation dated 28.11.2025, as per law, within eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. ¶4

Anil Kumar Joshi Vs Union of India — Uttarakhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

2025:UHC:10910

¶2

SL. No.	Date	Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures	COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
			WPMS/3406/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
			1. Mr. M.K. Ray, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. Shashank Upadhyaya, learned counsel for respondent no. 2 – NIOS. 4. Petitioner possesses B.Ed. qualification. He pursued Bridge Course, conducted by National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS) and appeared in the examination held by the said Body in 2019. The grievance raised by petitioner is that the marks scored by him, in practical examination, have not been mentioned in the mark-sheet issued to him by NIOS.
			5. Reliefs sought in this writ petition are as follows:- (i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to consider the case of the petitioner by correcting the Mark-sheet of Bridge Course completed by the petitioner in the year 2019 forthwith. (ii) direct the Respondent No. 2 to conclude and decide the Representation dated 21.11.2025 within stipulated period.
			6. Mr. Shashank Upadhyaya, learned counsel appearing for NIOS, on instructions, submits that since representation made by petitioner on 28.11.2025 is pending consideration before the Competent Authority, therefore, decision thereupon shall be

¶3

2025:UHC:10910

¶4

taken, within eight weeks.
7. The writ petition is, accordingly,
disposed of with a direction to
respondent no. 2 to take decision on
petitioner’s representation dated
28.11.2025, as per law, within eight
weeks from the date of receipt of
certified copy of this order.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
09.12.2025
Aswal
NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.12.09 04:18:49 -08'00'

Anil Kumar Joshi v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar Joshi v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Kumar Vs Uttarakhand Transport Corporation of Uttarakhand

Deepti Sagar Vs State of Uttarakhand

Atul Kumar Singhal Vs Excise Commissioner State of Uttarakhand

Yogesh Singh Dhapola Vs State of Uttarakhand

Chandan Singh Kirola Vs State of Uttarakhand

Tarun Joshi Vs State of Uttarakhand