One-time settlement application of the petitioners was accepted by the bank, so the writ petition challenging recovery proceedings became infructuous and was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2025:UHC:710
| SL. No. |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/02/ 2025 |
WPMS No. 3376 of 2024 Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. |
||
| Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for | |||
| the petitioners, Mr. M.S. Bisht, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1 and Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 & 3. 2. As per the submissions of Mr. Sanjay |
|||
| Kumar, Advocate and Mr. Ashish Joshi, | |||
| Advocate, OTS Application dated |
|||
| 08.01.2025, filed by the petitioners, has | |||
| been accepted for Rs.21.60 lakh OTS | |||
| amount against total memoranda outstanding of Rs.24.49 lakh. |
|||
| 3. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate, |
|||
| submitted that since the OTS Application of | |||
| the petitioners has been accepted, |
|||
| therefore, the present writ petition has | |||
| become infructuous. | |||
| 4. The said submission has not been |
|||
| opposed by the respondents. 5. The present writ petition (WPMS 3376 of 2024) is dismissed as infructuous. |
|||
| (Alok Kumar Verma, J.) 11.02.2025 Shiv/ |
2025:UHC:710
Petitioners (WPMS 3376 of 2024)
Respondent No. 1
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
