Disposed¶7

Vikram Singh Danu v. State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand HC27 Nov 2025WPMS/3297/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WPMS No. 3297 of 2025; MCC No. 2 of 2025; time extension application; Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.; 19.12.2025; writ petition disposed 27.11.2025; interim direction — no coercive action till 15.12.2025 or decision on revision petition/interim relief application, whichever earlier; Revisional Authority to hear all stakeholders; lawyers' strike; threat of demolition; protection extended till 01.02.2026; State of Uttarakhand; counsel Yogesh Kumar Pacholia (petitioners) and Suyash Pant (Standing Counsel).

What did the court decide?

Extension till 01.02.2026 of the protection (no coercive action against the petitioner) originally granted vide order dated 27.11.2025; time extension application (MCC No. 2 of 2025) disposed of. ¶7

Vikram Singh Danu Vs State of Uttarakhand — Uttarakhand HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

SL. No	Date	Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures	COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
			WPMS No. 3297 of 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
			1. Mr. Yogesh Kumar Pacholia, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. This writ petition was disposed of vide judgment dated 27.11.2025 with the following direction:- “Having regard to the fact that petitioner is before Revisional Authority, the writ petition is disposed of by providing that till 15.12.2025 or till decision is taken on petitioner’s revision petition or interim relief application, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against him. The Revisional Authority is directed to decide the revision filed by petitioner after hearing all the stakeholders.” 4. Today the matter is listed on time extension application. 5. It is submitted that due to lawyers strike, the revision filed by petitioner could not be decided and there is threat of demolition looming large over the petitioner. 6. Having regard to the fact of the case, the protection granted vide order dated 27.11.2025 is extended till 01.02.2026. 7. Accordingly, the time extension application, the same (MCC No. 2 of 2025) is disposed of.
			(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J) 19.12.2025 Aswal

Vikram Singh Danu v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikram Singh Danu v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd Sazid Vs State of Uttarakhand

Shambhu Datt Sati Vs State of Uttarakhand

Puran Singh Deopa and Others Vs State of Uttarakhand

Mss Sheetla Distributors Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Uttarakhand

Manisha Vs State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Department of Women Empowerment and Child Development Dehrad

Naresh Ram Vs State of Uttarakhand