Petitioner challenged a revisional court order permitting amendment of respondents' counter claim against a co-defendant, alleging bias and non-compliance with Order VIII Rule 6-A CPC. The High Court found no illegality in the revisional court's findings and declined to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2025:UHC:10539
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition Misc. Single No. 3289 of 2025
27 November, 2025
Munandra Singh Jagwan --Petitioner Versus Kailash Kumar and Ors. --Respondents
Presence :-
Ms. Neeti Rana, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral)
This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner challenging the judgment and order dated 07.10.2025 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Vikasnagar, District Dehradun in Civil Revision No.10 of 2025 Kailash Kumar and Others Vs. Munandra Singh Jagwan , whereby, the revision filed by the revisionists (respondents herein) was allowed and the order dated 17.03.2025 passed by learned Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Vikasnagar, District Dehradun, was set aside.
1
2025:UHC:10539
Others Vs. Munandra Singh Jagwan , before the learned Additional District Judge, Vikasnagar, District Dehradun challenging the order dated 17.03.2025, which was allowed by the impugned judgment and order dated 07.10.2025 and the order dated 17.03.2025 was set aside. Thus, petitioner is before this Court by challenging the order dated 07.10.2025 passed by learned Revisional Court.
2
2025:UHC:10539
( Pankaj Purohit, J .) 27.11.2025
PN PREETI NEGI Digitally signed by PREETI NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=63c75a8c4765581180a58d7478fadbe38331bac55c78b5f9f0276c16432f6aab, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=2BA53171893B3C3CB3CCCAE81FAE064498483A83D84BDB0F9229D5BF08D959AC, cn=PREETI NEGI Date: 2025.11.27 15:34:16 +05'30'
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revisional court's order allowing amendment of the respondents' counter claim was illegal and liable to interference under Article 227.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Munandra Singh Jagwan
Kailash Kumar
Pankaj Purohit
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
