Allowed

Madarsa Darul Uloom Zakariya v. State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand HC30 Oct 2025WPMS/3006/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court granted identical relief as in WPMS No. 835 of 2025, directing state authorities to unseal the petitioner's Madarsa premises subject to undertaking that petitioner will not operate the institution without due recognition and will not use 'Madarsa' in its name until duly registered or recognized.

What did the court decide?

Directing state authorities to unseal the petitioner's Madarsa premises subject to petitioner giving undertaking that he will neither run the Madarsa nor use the expression 'Madarsa' in the institutio

Madarsa Darul Uloom Zakariya Vs State of… — Education and Admissions | Uttarakhand HC (2025)

¶1

2025:UHC:9587

¶2

SL. No.	Date	Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures	COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
			WPMS/3006/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
			1. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the petitioner.
			2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Sanding Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
			3. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief:- (i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to permanently unseal the premises of the petitioner’s Madarsa Darul-Uloom Zakariya Situated at Village Bijholi Tehsil Roorkee District Haridwar and petitioner will gave undertaking to respondents authority that in future petitioner will not operate Madarsa in-question which have been illegally sealed by the respondents without due recognition by the state government under the rules and regulations.
			4. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon a judgment rendered by this Court in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 835 of 2025 and submitted that since identical issue has been decided, therefore, this petition be also decided in terms of the judgment rendered in the said writ petition.
			5. Learned State Counsel concedes that issue involved in this petition is identical.
			6. In such view of the matter, this petition is decided in terms of the judgment dated 26.08.2025 rendered in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 835 of 2025.
			7. Petitioner shall give undertaking before the concerned Sub-Divisional Magistrate that he will neither run Madarsa nor use the expression “Madarsa” in the name of Institution run by him till the time his

¶3

2025:UHC:9587

¶4

Institution is duly registered/recognised by Uttarakhand Madarsa Education Board. 8. It is made clear that if petitioner fails to abide by the undertaking given by him or if he is found unauthorisedly using the expression “Madarsa” in the name of Institution run by him, the Authorities shall be free to take necessary action against the petitioner. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 30.10.2025 Aswal NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Digitally signed by NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eacc6757ee7881e933ff8934f07477005aa85f9802a3a08b08d1369512ea30f3, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=44EB54CBF00B7698CB6F10C2CE3D26F5C22DACF4F4610C1FE58A58531726FBB0, cn=NITI RAJ SINGH ASWAL Date: 2025.10.30 20:15:42 -07'00'

Madarsa Darul Uloom Zakariya v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madarsa Darul Uloom Zakariya v. State of Uttarakhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar Deep Vs State of Uttarakhand

Barkha Kanyal Vs State of Uttarakhand

Spark Educational and Medical Awareness Welfare Society Vs State of Uttarakhand

Mirza Nadeem Beg Vs Uttarakhand Wafq Board

Geeta Rautela Vs State of Uttarakhand

Murli Kashyap Vs Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology