Petitioner, debarred for allegedly using unfair means during a semester examination, sought quashing of the debarring order and permission to continue B.Tech studies. Both sides agreed the matter was covered by two earlier writ petitions; the court disposed of it in terms of those judgments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2025:UHC:4530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
04th JUNE, 2025
WRIT PETITION NO. 2557 of 2024 (M/S)
Sanskriti Uniyal …Petitioner
Versus
G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar and Another
…Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents : Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, Advocate.
Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.
The present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following
prayers:-
“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 27/28th August 2024 issued by the office of Registrar GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar, qua the petitioner whereby, the petitioner on the allegations of using unfair means during semester examination has been debarred for the academic year 2023-24. (Contained as Annexure no. 2 to this petition),
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to provisionally appear and persue B.Tech IInd Year and onwards course for the academic session 2024-25.
(iii) Issue any other and further order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.
(iv) Award costs of the petition to the petitioner.”
2. Heard Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for
1
2025:UHC:4530
the petitioner and Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for both the parties submitted that the present matter is covered by the judgment dated 02.11.2023, passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Writ Petition (M/S) No.1612 of 2023, “Dipesh Phulera Vs. G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar and Others” and Writ Petition (M/S) No.1650 of 2023, “Himanshu Raj Vs. G.B. Pant University and Others”.
4. With the consent of both the parties, the present Writ Petition (WPMS No.2557 of 2024) is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated 02.11.2023, passed in Writ Petition (M/S) No.1612 of 2023, “Dipesh Phulera Vs. G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar and Others” and Writ Petition (M/S) No.1650 of 2023, “Himanshu Raj Vs. G.B. Pant University and Others”.
___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Dt: 04.06.2025
Pant/
2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dipesh Phulera Vs. G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar and OthersFollowed¶4
Writ Petition (M/S) No.1612 of 2023
Himanshu Raj Vs. G.B. Pant University and OthersFollowed¶4
Writ Petition (M/S) No.1650 of 2023
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanskriti Uniyal
G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, District Udham Singh Nagar
Another
Alok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
