Disposed
Deepanshu Sharma v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCWPMS/2421/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPMS No. 2421 of 2024 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. |
|||
| 1. Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. |
|||
| 2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Prayer for correction is not opposed by the State Counsel. |
|||
| 4. The expression “15.06.2025” in para 19 of the judgment dated 28.10.2025 be substituted as “15.06.2024”. 5. Accordingly, correction application (MCC No. 7 of 2025) stands disposed of. |
|||
| ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 18.11.2025 Aswal |
Petitioner
State of Uttarakhand
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
Aswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court