Manoj v. Commissioner Excise State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissal for infructuity: single-judge order dated 03.09.2025 by Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. (High Court of Uttarakhand) in WPMS No. 178 of 2024. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate appeared for the petitioner (petitioner's name not stated in the order); Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional Chief Standing Counsel, represented the State of Uttarakhand. Counsel declared the writ petition infructuous by efflux of time and the court dismissed it as infructuous. No statutes, precedents, or amounts involved.
What did the court decide?
Upon counsel for the petitioner stating at the bar that the writ petition had become infructuous by efflux of time, the court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous. ¶1