Deep Chand Saini and Ors. v. State of Uttarakhand
Case brief
What is this about?
WPCRL No.904 of 2024, decided 11.03.2025 by Pankaj Purohit, J.: writ petition dismissed as infructuous after State counsel stated at bar that the charge sheet was submitted on 24.12.2024, undisputed by petitioners' counsel. Petitioners represented by Pankaj Semwal, Advocate holding brief of Deep Chandra Joshi, Advocate; State represented by Vipul Painuly, B.H.; no representation for private respondents. No statutes or precedents cited or discussed.
What did the court decide?
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the State that the charge sheet had already been submitted on 24.12.2024 (a fact not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners), the writ petition had become infructuous and was dismissed as infructuous. ¶1